From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Certain numbers of special forms cause changing behaviour on function calls in --batch Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 20:40:39 +0300 Message-ID: <83furuvalk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8760stvwzp.fsf@web.de> <83r3bevhfc.fsf@gnu.org> <495b6239-364c-473e-9df5-7fc53962438a@online.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1467308512 29491 80.91.229.3 (30 Jun 2016 17:41:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 17:41:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: me@wilfred.me.uk, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas =?windows-1252?Q?R=F6hler?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 30 19:41:45 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bIfxv-0006yk-FV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 19:41:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51861 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bIfxu-00056E-OU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 13:41:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33478) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bIfxn-00054C-2z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 13:41:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bIfxm-0004IG-0q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 13:41:19 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:43226) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bIfxi-0004Hv-2j; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 13:41:14 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4805 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bIfxe-0006E9-M6; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 13:41:12 -0400 In-reply-to: <495b6239-364c-473e-9df5-7fc53962438a@online.de> (message from Andreas =?windows-1252?Q?R=F6hler?= on Thu, 30 Jun 2016 19:20:50 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:205005 Archived-At: > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, me@wilfred.me.uk > From: Andreas Röhler > Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 19:20:50 +0200 > > AFAIU parts of the display engine obviously work different in batch mode > > At > > http://debbugs.gnu.org/db/16/16853.html > > it reads: " > > The point of the > example was to show that pos-visible-in-window-p doesn't work normally > in batch mode. " > > Not sure if that must be a bug. It might make sense and being the purpose of batch, not to provide real buffer visibility. > > Hence a visual line might not exist for the very same reasons then - at > least if I had to design a batch mode ;) Yes. Which is why I gave a simple recipe to find out whether this is the source of the problem.