From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24273: 25.1.50; Unexpected return value from `color-name-to-rgb' Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 15:17:52 +0300 Message-ID: <83fupzd47j.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wpjbydp4.fsf@gmail.com> <1471687906.14623.0@smtp.gmail.com> <83h9afd675.fsf@gnu.org> <87inuv4par.fsf@linux-m68k.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1471695497 24700 195.159.176.226 (20 Aug 2016 12:18:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 12:18:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: julien@danjou.info, simenheg@gmail.com, 24273@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 20 14:18:13 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bb5E4-0006Bt-I1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 14:18:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32902 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bb5E1-0006hR-S9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 08:18:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45300) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bb5Dv-0006hK-S7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 08:18:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bb5Du-0008NL-PK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 08:18:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37093) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bb5Du-0008NH-Lg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 08:18:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bb5Du-0002Ur-I7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 08:18:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 12:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24273 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24273-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24273.14716954799587 (code B ref 24273); Sat, 20 Aug 2016 12:18:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24273) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Aug 2016 12:17:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34805 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bb5Dq-0002UZ-N6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 08:17:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54292) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bb5Do-0002UL-Kd for 24273@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 08:17:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bb5De-0008MP-S2 for 24273@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 08:17:51 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:32858) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bb5De-0008ML-OS; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 08:17:46 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1538 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bb5Dc-0003on-L9; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 08:17:45 -0400 In-reply-to: <87inuv4par.fsf@linux-m68k.org> (message from Andreas Schwab on Sat, 20 Aug 2016 14:07:08 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:122421 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: Simen Heggestøyl , > julien@danjou.info, 24273@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 14:07:08 +0200 > > On Aug 20 2016, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 12:11:46 +0200 > >> From: Simen Heggestøyl > >> Cc: 24273@debbugs.gnu.org > >> > >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Julien Danjou > >> wrote: > >> > What are the return values of: > >> > (color-values "white") > >> > and > >> > (color-values "#ffffff") > >> > ? > >> > >> (color-values "white") > >> ⇒ (65535 65535 65535) > >> > >> (color-values "#ffffff") > >> ⇒ (65280 65280 65280) > > > > Which means "white" and "#ffffff" are not the same color. > > Actually they are, because #ffffff and #ffffffffffff are the same color > on a display with 8 bits per color. I don't think I follow you. What does 8 bits per color have to do with this, and how do you know the OP has 8 bits per color on his display? FWIW, on my display, I get (65535 65535 65535) for both expressions.