From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25851: 25.2; GTK warning when starting Emacs when desktop file has more than one frame Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 18:18:06 +0200 Message-ID: <83fuixnf7l.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a89c51qb.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <831suoub86.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgswmi6a.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <83vas0rozb.fsf@gnu.org> <87k28fso3o.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <83o9xrsmrd.fsf@gnu.org> <874lzjsh8t.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <87y3wvqqos.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <83fuj2smzr.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpccmv71.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <87d1e4mq48.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <83innvppz4.fsf@gnu.org> <58B546EE.2030500@gmx.at> <831suipb3r.fsf@gnu.org> <58B5C4A1.6050601@gmx.at> <83shmyno97.fsf@gnu.org> <58B6866B.2040307@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1488385280 26595 195.159.176.226 (1 Mar 2017 16:21:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 16:21:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: nljlistbox2@gmail.com, 25851@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 01 17:21:14 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cj706-0006JY-5O for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 17:21:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47459 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cj70C-0008GX-6u for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 11:21:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49304) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cj6xz-0006iW-8V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 11:19:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cj6xy-0006l9-BN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 11:19:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36399) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cj6xy-0006l3-8s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 11:19:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cj6xy-0003aP-40 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 11:19:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 16:19:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25851 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25851-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25851.148838511613751 (code B ref 25851); Wed, 01 Mar 2017 16:19:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25851) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Mar 2017 16:18:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34598 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cj6xX-0003Zj-Mo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 11:18:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57973) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cj6xW-0003ZU-CP for 25851@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 11:18:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cj6xQ-0006Pb-8l for 25851@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 11:18:29 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:40929) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cj6xQ-0006PU-5t; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 11:18:28 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4981 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cj6xP-0002cZ-DI; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 11:18:27 -0500 In-reply-to: <58B6866B.2040307@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Wed, 01 Mar 2017 09:29:31 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:129989 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 09:29:31 +0100 > From: martin rudalics > CC: nljlistbox2@gmail.com, 25851@debbugs.gnu.org > > >> IIUC we do all this trickery to make a new frame with the left or > >> top edge off-screen. > > > > Do we understand the purpose of this? > > The purpose of what? If you asked why people want to show a frame with > the top or left edge off-screen, then the major goup of clients might be > those who want to move the titlebar out of view. Yes, that's what I asked. If that's the reason, and we think doing that is legitimate, is there any other solution but to shut up the warning?