From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `thunk-let'? Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 17:40:13 +0200 Message-ID: <83fu9komci.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87infp9z6j.fsf@web.de> <87zi90eehg.fsf@web.de> <87o9ocd6s4.fsf@web.de> <83zi7wr6jc.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1z0csxa.fsf_-_@web.de> <83k1yzqshk.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2t7wc9d.fsf@web.de> <83d14rqjv8.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7zvvye9.fsf@web.de> <83375mr2da.fsf@gnu.org> <874lq0n8o5.fsf@web.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1510414858 21448 195.159.176.226 (11 Nov 2017 15:40:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 15:40:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: nicolas@petton.fr, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 11 16:40:51 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eDXtr-0005H3-72 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 16:40:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46016 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eDXty-0002NC-5p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 10:40:58 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49407) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eDXtP-0002Mv-1S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 10:40:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eDXtK-0007c1-RI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 10:40:22 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:57846) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eDXtK-0007bx-O5; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 10:40:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2440 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1eDXtJ-00045X-RO; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 10:40:18 -0500 In-reply-to: <874lq0n8o5.fsf@web.de> (message from Michael Heerdegen on Sat, 11 Nov 2017 16:20:58 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:220079 Archived-At: > From: Michael Heerdegen > Cc: nicolas@petton.fr, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 16:20:58 +0100 > > Ok, then `when-let*'. It's surely useful not only in Emacs internals. > Lot's of packages in Gnu Elpa use it. Then it should be moved to subr.el or some other file. And it should be documented. > FWIW, my impression was always that subr-x.el was thought as an extension > library for subr.el, and for me, it kind of looks like that. If that is the case, it makes no sense not to document what's in there.