From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Performance degradation from long lines Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 05:35:12 +0200 Message-ID: <83ftru5bin.fsf@gnu.org> References: <665d5f3d84c071632f87f66ffedb6aed@webmail.orcon.net.nz> <83sh0uqhw8.fsf@gnu.org> <83h8haqd2g.fsf@gnu.org> <1c7973ecaeb4478a81dcf17e9257620c@webmail.orcon.net.nz> <34b92ce4-7b3d-97c7-f59e-e61e9564a7b0@orcon.net.nz> <55c0781a-8c15-f0c5-a80b-40e7c37507da@orcon.net.nz> <71558cda-bfb1-22c0-1b9c-ad8f458817da@orcon.net.nz> <83pnt2f80q.fsf@gnu.org> <85d7a4df-27b1-1cc5-64b0-95fc7bd14ccb@orcon.net.nz> <834l8a7unk.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="231965"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: mithraeum@protonmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Phil Sainty Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 11 04:35:32 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h3Bit-000yBl-QO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 04:35:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54728 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h3Bis-0007xl-LS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 23:35:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45396) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h3Bim-0007xG-MC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 23:35:25 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58378) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h3Bil-0001P8-6D; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 23:35:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1854 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1h3Bik-00075r-7O; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 23:35:22 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Phil Sainty on Mon, 11 Mar 2019 12:31:16 +1300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:234050 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 12:31:16 +1300 > From: Phil Sainty > Cc: mithraeum@protonmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > :package-version had looked to me like the way to handle versioning in > this scenario, so that the same code accounted for both situations. Does it? The :version tag is important for Emacs to know which variables were added/changed in what Emacs version, to say something like "this variable was added in Emacs version X.Y.Z", and also to support commands like customize-changed. Does :package-version support all that?