From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36304: 27.0.50; request: switch to the superior HTML #RGB convention for colors Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 14:40:13 +0300 Message-ID: <83fto1onky.fsf@gnu.org> References: Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="122709"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: rms@gnu.org, 36304@debbugs.gnu.org To: Pip Cet Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 22 13:41:24 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1heeOa-000VoW-CB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 13:41:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40012 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1heeOY-0001YG-QH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 07:41:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53127) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1heeOF-0001Xx-Lz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 07:41:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1heeOE-0006ZD-J7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 07:41:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37473) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1heeOE-0006Z1-EP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 07:41:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1heeOE-0001hk-AJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 07:41:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 11:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36304 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 36304-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36304.15612036546528 (code B ref 36304); Sat, 22 Jun 2019 11:41:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36304) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jun 2019 11:40:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51017 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1heeO5-0001hE-RO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 07:40:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47209) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1heeO4-0001h2-9d for 36304@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 07:40:52 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59808) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1heeNs-00064D-Sx; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 07:40:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4111 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1heeNY-0006c7-DA; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 07:40:23 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Pip Cet on Sat, 22 Jun 2019 11:23:35 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:160977 Archived-At: > From: Pip Cet > Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 11:23:35 +0000 > Cc: 36304@debbugs.gnu.org > > Here's a patch. I've read the documentation and it appears already to > have been updated by someone so it no longer links to the X > documentation. > > * src/xterm.c (x_parse_color): Translate #RGB notation to rgb:R/G/B > notation, which X handles slightly differently. Can this change be limited to xterm.c alone? I think we assume this color handling also in xfaces.c and in lisp/term/tty-colors.el (and perhaps elsewhere, where TTY colors are used/defined). There's also lisp/color.el. Am I missing something?