From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: BIKESHED: completion faces Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 16:16:09 +0200 Message-ID: <83ftiq5ys6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87lfsrqs63.fsf@gmail.com> <838soqeuzr.fsf@gnu.org> <87ftiyn07t.fsf@gmail.com> <8336eycvpf.fsf@gnu.org> <83pni2bcws.fsf@gnu.org> <83imnubax9.fsf@gnu.org> <83h83eb8od.fsf@gnu.org> <83d0e2b32k.fsf@gnu.org> <83r22ha64z.fsf@gnu.org> <831ruh9siv.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2wp8cnq.fsf@gnu.org> <83woc983so.fsf@gnu.org> <86c1b45c-0a25-b1ed-ffb1-7dc0e50bd5d9@yandex.ru> <83v9rm7pvk.fsf@gnu.org> <932fdd81-142d-929a-4dc6-e320e3b918f8@yandex.ru> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="208592"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: spacibba@aol.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, joaotavora@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 14 15:18:34 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iVFxC-000s6P-1w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 15:18:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58146 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVFx9-0005vN-TE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 09:18:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42984) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVFvE-0005uJ-Qo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 09:16:34 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51347) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVFv9-0005je-V3; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 09:16:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1033 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iVFv8-0007nd-2t; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 09:16:27 -0500 In-reply-to: <932fdd81-142d-929a-4dc6-e320e3b918f8@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:40:39 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:242166 Archived-At: > Cc: joaotavora@gmail.com, spacibba@aol.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:40:39 +0200 > > On 14.11.2019 11:45, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > I'm not sure I understand what customization scenarios you have in > > mind, so I don't think I see the problem. > > Basically any custom theme that sets the colors of these two faces? > > Luckily, they're currently normally left alone in custom themes. But > that could change when we add color to completions-common-face. > > An arbitrary theme like that is likely not to honor the said variable. > Would aliasing help somehow? Maybe. But since my proposal was rejected, it sounds like waste of time to discuss its details, no?