From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 1e3b0f2: Improve doc strings of project.el Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 18:13:23 +0300 Message-ID: <83ftarxf58.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87bllfqj82.fsf@warpmail.net> <83o8pfxhzq.fsf@gnu.org> <83imfnxgt3.fsf@gnu.org> <73f90d2e-b754-93e0-4caa-5f86601edd98@yandex.ru> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="111368"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: philip@warpmail.net, theo@thornhill.no, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 19 17:14:08 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jmIiU-000Sn7-H9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 17:14:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54618 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jmIiT-0008IY-Ji for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 11:14:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53232) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jmIhz-00072l-2U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 11:13:35 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48132) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jmIhy-0000J0-PL; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 11:13:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1811 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jmIhx-0000MC-FQ; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 11:13:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <73f90d2e-b754-93e0-4caa-5f86601edd98@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Fri, 19 Jun 2020 18:02:07 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:252370 Archived-At: > Cc: philip@warpmail.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 18:02:07 +0300 > > On 19.06.2020 17:37, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > As another provocative thought, should we perhaps consider the > > major-mode of the buffer? > > It's not the worst idea, but the set of "buffers belonging to the > current project" should probably be the same between > project-switch-to-buffer and project-kill-buffers. No, not necessarily. The purpose of the commands is different, so they could start with the same basic list, but apply different filters to it. > And as Philip explained, it's useful for the latter to consider many > different major modes. I'm talking about the former, not about the latter.