From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39200: Release 27.1 Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 07:58:50 +0300 Message-ID: <83ft8c7i7p.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87tv4qxr2x.fsf@gmx.de> <83v9h96w2h.fsf@gnu.org> <878se5jil5.fsf@gmx.de> <83pn7h6vbc.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22617"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: michael.albinus@gmx.de, stefan@marxist.se, 39200@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 24 07:00:14 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kA4ac-0005nr-0M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 07:00:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48598 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kA4ab-0008Qr-0l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 01:00:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46878) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kA4aQ-0008Pv-L0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 01:00:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44195) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kA4aQ-0005yR-6a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 01:00:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kA4aQ-0004ct-2g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 01:00:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 05:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39200 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 39200-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39200.159824514417694 (code B ref 39200); Mon, 24 Aug 2020 05:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39200) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Aug 2020 04:59:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55741 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kA4ZT-0004bK-TB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 00:59:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36612) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kA4ZR-0004aq-PW for 39200@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 00:59:02 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38018) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kA4ZL-0005tZ-NT; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 00:58:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3546 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kA4ZK-0007i2-L4; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 00:58:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Dmitry Gutov on Mon, 24 Aug 2020 01:58:21 +0300) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:186110 Archived-At: > Cc: stefan@marxist.se, 39200@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 01:58:21 +0300 > > On 23.08.2020 22:01, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >>> We didn't miss them. I decided they weren't important enough to hold > >>> the release. > >> That's pretty OK as maintainer decision. But shouldn't the two bugs then > >> be removed from blocking ones for bug#39200? At least a communication > >> about this decision I have missed, perhaps because I didn't see it. > > Some people react emotionally when I close bugs against their > > opinions, so I sometimes decide not to do that. > > I believe the suggestion was to remove them from blockers, not closing > them. Same issue here.