From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44638: [PATCH 1/2] autorevert: don't reuse existing watch descriptors Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 05:20:15 +0200 Message-ID: <83ft4ohp1s.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20201114165459.9518-1-sbaugh@catern.com> <835z67vooa.fsf@gnu.org> <878sb3myb8.fsf@catern.com> <874kl6iv08.fsf@catern.com> <838saik8n9.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtyyg0hd.fsf@gmx.de> <875z5lffja.fsf@gmx.de> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5736"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: sbaugh@catern.com, 44638@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 02 04:21:40 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kkIi3-0001No-V2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 04:21:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35294 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kkIi2-0000eZ-Fh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 22:21:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37576) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kkIhT-0000e9-Hc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 22:21:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50444) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kkIhR-0002Oy-R1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 22:21:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkIhR-0006if-M6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 22:21:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 03:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44638 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 44638-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44638.160687922725767 (code B ref 44638); Wed, 02 Dec 2020 03:21:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44638) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Dec 2020 03:20:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33757 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkIgt-0006hW-Jx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 22:20:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47382) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkIgq-0006hI-6x for 44638@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 22:20:27 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41520) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kkIgk-0002Bl-QN; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 22:20:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4592 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kkIgk-0001X1-Ae; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 22:20:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: <875z5lffja.fsf@gmx.de> (message from Michael Albinus on Tue, 01 Dec 2020 21:16:25 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:194765 Archived-At: > From: Michael Albinus > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 44638@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 21:16:25 +0100 > > Michael Albinus writes: > > > It's already on my todo list. Hmm, too much items there. I'll try to > > find a sufficient time slot tomorrow. > > As expected, it takes more time. Currently I'm writing a test case which > covers the problem. This must run then for different backends with and > w/o your patch, at least inotify, gfilenotify and kqueue. If possible > also for w32notify. Thanks, let me know if I can help with the latter.