From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#29713: 26.0; Provide completion for `make-frame-on-display' Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 08:16:54 +0200 Message-ID: <83ft0jkbah.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87y310wkzb.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <875zo4v1t1.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87eegcwofb.fsf@tcd.ie> <8735wsque1.fsf@linkov.net> <87mtv0nzam.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <878s6c2oxd.fsf@tcd.ie> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15768"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 29713@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, juri@linkov.net To: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 25 07:26:05 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lPJRU-00040a-VE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 07:26:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39486 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lPJRT-0001HK-UG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 02:26:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41644) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lPJJi-0003sy-FN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 02:18:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53635) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lPJJh-0006ss-W7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 02:18:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lPJJh-0000AG-SA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 02:18:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 06:18:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 29713 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 29713-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B29713.1616653026562 (code B ref 29713); Thu, 25 Mar 2021 06:18:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 29713) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Mar 2021 06:17:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36948 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lPJIn-00008z-RG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 02:17:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48498) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lPJIl-00008S-JN for 29713@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 02:17:03 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44356) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lPJIe-0006Jt-Hy; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 02:16:56 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4228 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lPJId-0001YZ-ME; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 02:16:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <878s6c2oxd.fsf@tcd.ie> (contovob@tcd.ie) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:202981 Archived-At: > From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" > Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 21:59:42 +0000 > Cc: 29713@debbugs.gnu.org, Lars Ingebrigtsen > > > Or maybe better to fall back to 'make-frame'? > > I.e. don't signal an error, don't ask a question, > > just create a new frame on the current display. > > > > So on --without-x builds, make-frame-on-display > > could be like an alias to make-frame. > > I have no strong preference between this option or just signalling an > error in the interactive spec. What do others think? I think we should signal an error: the user will not get what they want, so the user must be told.