From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-28 47cbd10: * lisp/bindings.el (mode-line-position): Improve tooltip. Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 16:30:47 +0300 Message-ID: <83fst5njaw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <834k9qy6hn.fsf@gnu.org> <831r4uy4ub.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtnih96h.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <83y272wnok.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmsev7uo.fsf@omarpolo.com> <83zgrdnlzj.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6315"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: schwab@linux-m68k.org, op@omarpolo.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 13 15:42:40 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1maeWm-0001RZ-AW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 15:42:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48834 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1maeWk-00082Z-Ln for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 09:42:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60604) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1maeLT-0006eo-Ef for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 09:31:00 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60296) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1maeLN-0005I1-RE; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 09:30:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3203 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1maeLM-0002Qr-BS; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 09:30:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Wed, 13 Oct 2021 14:56:13 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:276899 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 14:56:13 +0200 > Cc: Omar Polo , Andreas Schwab , > Emacs developers > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > No, because "position" in Emacs is too tightly coupled with a simple > > number that is a buffer position. Just look at our usage of that term > > in the documentation. > > So which of the proposed alternatives, or variation thereof, do you > prefer instead? The first one" Buffer Percentage Position". "Viewport Percentage Position" is also fine, although it wasn't really in your list.