From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Undo mode Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 21:41:53 +0200 Message-ID: <83fspgoozi.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86tudyw1ir.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <6d8355dee1bb42a18fd0@heytings.org> <87h79xxw7t.fsf@yahoo.com> <6d8355dee13363ee16cd@heytings.org> <83wnitnvum.fsf@gnu.org> <6d8355dee168648eba0c@heytings.org> <83lez9noq8.fsf@gnu.org> <6d8355dee1d428e87037@heytings.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37922"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 21 20:51:20 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nAzwO-0009eV-Cp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 20:51:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40056 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAzwN-0002Rk-1f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 14:51:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47490) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAznR-0003iy-DK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 14:42:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=50978 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAznO-0006ku-RS; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 14:42:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=ZBfl1COPT+Rdbd6l/tU9SkntC2kKddZxJ1rOTQ0hTII=; b=owgTxoJ9CEZz o+bpBXfqSecOhXcpmXzVUvVRT/JvBlzfIdhkpJLNQYXgfmHcsrC40uZHUaDMnWf0TGKR2rkzsn5Zv HzmEJuyORO3FKJzCpDKtz0yOGRL9jCUptLQqHIJKRxYxk5eYrvH1B5BgLIVMxdzSDWrNZds3XFIIn J72mI0vdgWrL9NRLKF0IldmOUHxt5763MFvviWyEHharMdkWT3DEV8cK8JZ3dsAVjuooZF75jARXZ AxnKSQlAhcMInJWqRC31qk2CB9+ymWiOXXKFRuxliv9pNEWgfVwWbkrXK5kZggpcLXBvXbSa2dk0T DNCWcPNdGGVaOuG2l9mgsQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4725 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAznO-0002kb-VN; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 14:42:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: <6d8355dee1d428e87037@heytings.org> (message from Gregory Heytings on Fri, 21 Jan 2022 14:48:44 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:285157 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 14:48:44 +0000 > From: Gregory Heytings > cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, juri@linkov.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > The three problems of the current state are: > > 1. All File menu items are shifted to the right because of a single > checkbox. Doesn't sound too bad to me. We have the same in Text menu, for example. > 2. The "Undelete Frame" item appears and disappears, instead of being > disabled and enabled. That's easy to change, but why is it better to show it disabled instead of not showing it at all? > 3. The frame undeletion items uses two entries in the File menu, IMO > that's one too much, and with the proposed options 1 and 2 it uses only > one. That's not a separate issue, so I don't think it counts.