From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs
Subject: bug#62762: 'make' often errors with "Org version mismatch" after
 pulling a new version of the code
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2023 14:40:37 +0300
Message-ID: <83fs91cr0q.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <17b74a48-94e1-9106-cc79-d31972313910@gutov.dev>
 <837cujaqzq.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn2ilwed.fsf@localhost>
 <83zg7ealrd.fsf@gnu.org> <87pm8a8dx4.fsf@localhost>
 <8335569rs7.fsf@gnu.org> <87jzyi8cu2.fsf@localhost>
 <83wn2i8bht.fsf@gnu.org> <875ya18oaz.fsf@localhost>
 <83zg7d78wv.fsf@gnu.org> <87fs94faes.fsf@localhost>
 <83zg7c41qq.fsf@gnu.org> <87h6tjeuei.fsf@localhost>
 <83o7nr4yrp.fsf@gnu.org> <87a5zb7rgu.fsf@localhost>
 <83pm85ctf5.fsf@gnu.org> <87pm85e5rr.fsf@localhost>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="39726"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: bzg@gnu.org, dmitry@gutov.dev, 62762@debbugs.gnu.org
To: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net>
Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 15 13:41:07 2023
Return-path: <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1pneHD-000A4s-Dv
	for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 13:41:07 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1pneH9-0007VC-MC; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 07:41:03 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1pneH8-0007V3-Hx
 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 07:41:02 -0400
Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1pneH8-00075w-AE
 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 07:41:02 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1pneH7-00057p-Vw
 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 07:41:02 -0400
X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org
Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Resent-Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2023 11:41:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.62762.B62762.168155884619661@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62762
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
Original-Received: via spool by 62762-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62762.168155884619661
 (code B ref 62762); Sat, 15 Apr 2023 11:41:01 +0000
Original-Received: (at 62762) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Apr 2023 11:40:46 +0000
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48408 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1pneGr-000572-VS
 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 07:40:46 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35210)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1pneGp-00056p-Rp
 for 62762@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 07:40:44 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1pneGk-00073f-Ja; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 07:40:38 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=5l2x6pm1+tfCIRTfS0UFxzIUS8UNBNTifN+BNGHgpXo=; b=WzgoMeEBzNYs
 H4DMMyKp51DVNOcNi5iOQeVYkZ19V5fdMaoBGRHDYQMzjswzX9b8Nhl8rN7MYBnWH2I81VJij3RMt
 GjVUs7ZIT6DLtVY8rz/w/VUbdlfResgZrBggZJELtw2dEju+HnqxZwLg8wOsP8unWIeubQ3RDUD6q
 kpZILYck5tC1a6tdTKP8rbSJCT5RcBQbX81pNZEGexoU4WexOCqrPqvUkscfn1jShc4t9oII2utBK
 wKjNg64W7j/UblNo7IWh2cH4gRScCU2c8FIIBz0YEyYX2kDSif+lxo2c1oEP7eS6e07ig7rb3ZXRW
 3K6lWcJpeKghIKG08FJaHw==;
Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1pneGj-0004Wt-C2; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 07:40:38 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87pm85e5rr.fsf@localhost> (message from Ihor Radchenko on Sat,
 15 Apr 2023 11:36:40 +0000)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
 the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-gnu-emacs>,
 <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
 <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:260033
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs/260033>

> From: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net>
> Cc: dmitry@gutov.dev, bzg@gnu.org, 62762@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2023 11:36:40 +0000
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > I wonder why org--built-in-p is a defconst, though: shouldn't it be a
> > defvar instead?
> 
> I wanted to make it clear that users must not set this variable.
> If you think that it is excessive, I can use defvar instead.

It's up to you, I don't mind.  (But if you decide to go with defconst,
maybe add a comment there explaining that this is the intent.)