From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr repository ready? Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:06:37 +0200 Message-ID: <83einsozea.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87639fr3w7.fsf@red-bean.com> <87vdhfpil2.fsf@red-bean.com> <87einvxy9c.fsf@red-bean.com> <20091118230952.GB908@muc.de> <87my2jw05z.fsf@red-bean.com> <83skc9pbf7.fsf@gnu.org> <87iqd5vw5n.fsf@red-bean.com> <877htl53tc.fsf@telefonica.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1258805266 21067 80.91.229.12 (21 Nov 2009 12:07:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:07:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?windows-1252?Q?=D3scar_Fuentes?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 21 13:07:38 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NBoka-0001xt-MI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:07:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34236 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NBoka-00064w-3c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:07:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NBokV-00064r-BA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:07:31 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NBokQ-00064H-KH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:07:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44339 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NBokQ-00064E-FK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:07:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:58222) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NBokP-0001OD-Sc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:07:26 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KTG00J00K1G9B00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:06:37 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.70.37.193]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KTG00EGFKB04LC0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:06:37 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <877htl53tc.fsf@telefonica.net> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:117430 Archived-At: > X-Spam-Status: No, score=3D-2.6 required=3D5.0 tests=3DAWL,BAYES_00= , > =09UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=3Dunavailable version=3D3.1.0 > From: =D3scar_Fuentes > Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:39:11 +0100 >=20 > On bzr parlance there are no lightweight branches. But the EmacsWiki page does use the "lightweight branch" terminology. Should it be corrected? > A non lightweight checkout supports committing changes without send= ing > them to the parent branch, using a command line option. When and why would this be useful? > A lightweight checkout does not support this because it lacks the > local VC data. Would a lightweight checkout from the master repository be a good ide= a for people who do not intend to send patches, just build the current development version? > Actually, a non lightweight checkout is what Bazaar calls a bound > branch. You can unbind a non-ligthweigth checkout anytimme for > converting it to a regular branch and you can bind a branch to some > other branch to convert it to a checkout of that branch. So checkouts and branches are mostly the same?