From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RLM and LRM are composed? Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 10:56:03 +0300 Message-ID: <83eiizy5bg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <837hov159z.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1270109592 3750 80.91.229.12 (1 Apr 2010 08:13:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 08:13:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 01 10:13:08 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NxFWV-0000Ms-Mk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 10:13:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59682 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NxFWU-0007Jj-W6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 04:13:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NxFGb-0004je-Ff for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 03:56:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36068 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NxFGX-0004iQ-S6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 03:56:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NxFGW-00048n-8r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 03:56:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:53939) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NxFGW-00048X-0X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 03:56:36 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L0600K00TWZDH00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 10:56:02 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.92.42]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L0600IEYU1E4O80@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 10:56:02 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:123011 Archived-At: > From: Kenichi Handa > Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:39:30 +0900 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Current code try to compose any non-spacing mark characters > with the previous spacing characters. Which is probably not a bad idea. > But, the detection of non-spacing mark is done by > (= (aref char-width-table CH) 0). Hmm.. and why is this wrong? Anyway, (aref char-width-table #x200f) => 0, so it sounds like the current detection should have worked. What am I missing? > at the moment, you can workaround the problem by this: > > (aset composition-function-table #x200f nil) Yes, this displays according to the display table as expected, thanks.