From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:54:41 +0200 Message-ID: <83eiajdee6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83bp5te3s8.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290016619 23308 80.91.229.12 (17 Nov 2010 17:56:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:56:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 17 18:56:55 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PImFa-0000dt-5q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:56:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33437 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PImFZ-00022i-SF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 12:56:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=32883 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PImFU-00022R-RB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 12:56:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PImFS-0001T2-Nm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 12:56:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:36704) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PImFS-0001Sk-FK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 12:56:46 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LC100600J2Z5600@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:56:44 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.249.126]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LC1005B4J6IMBC0@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:56:44 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:132788 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: Kenichi Handa , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 13:55:07 +0100 > > > It is annoying allright, but [U+1234][U+5678] is more readable than > > U+1234U+5678. However, if others disagree, I can change that back. > > \u1234\u5678 is even better. I'm fine with that, too. If no one objects, I will move to \uNNNN in a couple of days. Btw, how to display code points smaller than 256? \uNN or \u00NN?