From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: bzr + savannah.gnu.org slow again Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:49:33 +0200 Message-ID: <83ei6vp4de.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4D689BED.5020908@cs.ucla.edu> <4D68A2B9.7070007@cs.ucla.edu> <83hbbrp6xw.fsf@gnu.org> <871v2vtdq9.fsf@rho.meyering.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298710215 19359 80.91.229.12 (26 Feb 2011 08:50:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 08:50:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, Savannah-hackers-public@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jim Meyering Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 26 09:50:03 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PtFqj-0003NP-1p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 09:50:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55378 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PtFqi-0006hP-Ar for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 03:50:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41293 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PtFqX-0006a0-UZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 03:49:55 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PtFqS-0000B5-RN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 03:49:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:63445) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PtFqI-000089-Jm; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 03:49:34 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LH700300UX9KR00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:49:31 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.53.157]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LH70031WV6G3U60@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:49:30 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <871v2vtdq9.fsf@rho.meyering.net> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:136548 Archived-At: > From: Jim Meyering > Cc: Paul Eggert , Savannah-hackers-public@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 09:13:50 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 22:50:33 -0800 > >> From: Paul Eggert > >> Cc: Savannah-hackers-public@gnu.org > >> > >> Following up on my previous message, my commit to the Emacs trunk > >> took over 50 minutes (!). > > > > I get "only" 5.5 minutes here, about 2 hours after Paul's commit: > > > > 331.016 Committed revid eliz@gnu.org-20110226074438-z9zfono0mhgzr4ri > > as revno 103425. > > 331.547 Transferred: 244kB (0.7kB/s r:137kB w:107kB) > > > > But something's definitely wrong again. "bzr up" again took 3.5 > > minutes, which is about 4-5 times longer than it usually takes for me. > > Load average was 150 -- mostly due to cgit.cgi processes. > I killed them, again. It may be robots that need to be told to go away. Thanks. I still get very slow commits, half an hour after you did it: 41.953 fetch up to rev {eliz@gnu.org-20110226083656-wtcszqlzmytktl8w} [ 1288] 2011-02-26 10:43:20.466 INFO: Committed revision 103426. 393.406 Committed revid eliz@gnu.org-20110226083656-wtcszqlzmytktl8w as revno 103426. 393.812 Transferred: 307kB (0.8kB/s r:137kB w:170kB) That's 6.5 minutes, with most of it sitting and waiting for the commit to complete on the server. So either the problem is back, or it takes bzr.savannah.gnu.org some time to recover.