From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Any objection to adding a unicode footnote style? (encoding fixed) Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 20:28:50 +0300 Message-ID: <83ei47iy0d.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83oc3djmda.fsf@gnu.org> <83k4e1jesg.fsf@gnu.org> <83bozcjqu9.fsf@gnu.org> <874o53g9xv.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83k4dzj1vo.fsf@gnu.org> <87iptjetd4.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83hb93iz9n.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1304962178 16447 80.91.229.12 (9 May 2011 17:29:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 17:29:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alp Aker Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 09 19:29:31 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QJUGv-0002BM-Nk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 19:29:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40223 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJUGv-0006qv-97 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 13:29:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56324) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJUGs-0006nz-3L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 13:29:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJUGr-0004yB-53 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 13:29:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:44651) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJUGq-0004y2-Tp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 13:29:25 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LKX00400U8POJ00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 20:28:44 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.234.175]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LKX002JYV7VXHO0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 09 May 2011 20:28:44 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:139287 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 13:06:54 -0400 (EDT) > From: Alp Aker > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > AFAIK, what you see on NextStep is how it works on _any_ GUI display. > > The implementation is device-independent. Making the digit smaller > > (with `height', as I show in my other message) alleviates the effect > > on the line height to some degree. > > I don't think you're right here. A (raise 0.5) display spec on NextStep > increases the line height, and does nothing else. It doesn't change the > vertical position of the character relative to the baseline. Maybe it's a bug in NextStep, then. The implementation is in xdisp.c, at least most of it.