From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Move initialization to compile time Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 19:11:39 +0300 Message-ID: <83ehodats4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83fw8tawux.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1342368715 29497 80.91.229.3 (15 Jul 2012 16:11:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 16:11:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dmantipov@yandex.ru, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 15 18:11:55 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SqRQH-0003pZ-Ot for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 18:11:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54227 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SqRQG-0005Eg-U0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 12:11:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54144) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SqRQF-0005Eb-0q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 12:11:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SqRQE-00075X-1A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 12:11:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:48094) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SqRQD-00075Q-P1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 12:11:49 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M7700G00M90JC00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 19:11:35 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.210.75]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M7700F5SMBAT0C0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 19:11:34 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:151626 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: Dmitry Antipov , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 18:02:54 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > AFAIK, this moves interval_block_index from the .bss section to .data > > section. > > Why is that a problem? I didn't say it was. But since (AFAIK) one of them is shared, while the other isn't, and since some ports CANNOT_DUMP, I thought perhaps such changes need to be carefully considered first.