From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Proposal to improve the nomenclature of scrolling directions Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 20:23:58 +0200 Message-ID: <83ehk94475.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83fw4p46nd.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1352053459 15410 80.91.229.3 (4 Nov 2012 18:24:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 18:24:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dani Moncayo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 04 19:24:28 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TV4rz-0008FU-MC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 19:24:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41706 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TV4rq-00037j-Q3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 13:24:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56861) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TV4rn-00037e-WD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 13:24:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TV4rn-0002l3-28 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 13:24:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:45921) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TV4rm-0002kT-Pt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 13:24:14 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MCZ0080072AR300@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 20:24:06 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MCZ008MP7458V90@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 20:24:05 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:154672 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 18:35:02 +0100 > From: Dani Moncayo > Cc: Juanma Barranquero , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > How about page-up and page-down? Since they are the same as the key > > names, it's possible that users will not be confused by the "who moves > > up" dilemma. > > But as you know, there is a lot of scrolling commands beyond those > two, like for example "scroll-up-line". page-down-line will do. > Therefore, we should find a general solution for this. I don't see why.