From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14540: 24.3.50; Doc: pos-visible-in-window-p: ROWH Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 19:34:48 +0300 Message-ID: <83ehchx2af.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87fvx0108w.fsf@web.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1370363777 17343 80.91.229.3 (4 Jun 2013 16:36:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 16:36:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 14540@debbugs.gnu.org To: michael_heerdegen@web.de Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 04 18:36:15 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UjuDX-0006QR-Hf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 18:36:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53815 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UjuDW-0001UN-Ko for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 12:36:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39590) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UjuDQ-0001T7-2Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 12:36:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UjuDL-0005Qn-Dc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 12:36:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34151) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UjuDL-0005Qj-9d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 12:36:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UjuFF-0005GU-KO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 12:38:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 16:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14540 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 14540-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14540.137036385120163 (code B ref 14540); Tue, 04 Jun 2013 16:38:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14540) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jun 2013 16:37:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50742 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UjuEl-0005FA-Co for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 12:37:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:53109) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UjuEj-0005Et-7r for 14540@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 12:37:30 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MNV00M00NAYLW00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 14540@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 19:34:50 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MNV00LZYNE2YNF0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 19:34:50 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87fvx0108w.fsf@web.de> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:74801 Archived-At: > From: Michael Heerdegen > Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 02:55:27 +0200 > > in the docstring of `pos-visible-in-window-p', the explanation of ROWH > is not understandable (wrong, in my opinion). > > It sounds like it would be the (complete) height of the row (visible + > non-visible part). AFAICT, ROWH specifies the _visible_ height, as > mentioned in the manual (info "(elisp) Window Start and End"). > > I suggest to replace > > [...]; otherwise, RTOP and RBOT are the number of pixels off-window at > the top and bottom of the row, ROWH is the height of the display row, > and VPOS is the row number (0-based) containing POS. > > by something like: > > [...]; otherwise, RTOP and RBOT are the number of pixels off-window at > the top and bottom of the display row at POSITION, ROWH is the visible > height of that row, and VPOS is the (0-based) row number. Thanks, fixed in trunk revision 112848.