From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15747: Patch to optionally display raw bytes in hexadecimal Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 05:47:18 +0200 Message-ID: <83eh73e7y1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87hac0uqtk.fsf@nbtrap.com> <83vc0gdnej.fsf@gnu.org> <87r4b49esd.fsf@nbtrap.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1383104893 25677 80.91.229.3 (30 Oct 2013 03:48:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 03:48:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15747@debbugs.gnu.org, nbtrap@nbtrap.com To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 30 04:48:16 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VbMlU-00082p-BA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 04:48:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50388 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbMlT-0007F2-VC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 23:48:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50539) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbMlL-0007Es-TO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 23:48:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbMlG-0006Jn-PJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 23:48:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37872) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbMlG-0006Jj-Le for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 23:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VbMlG-0008EA-CC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 23:48:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 03:48:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15747 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 15747-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15747.138310484531580 (code B ref 15747); Wed, 30 Oct 2013 03:48:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15747) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Oct 2013 03:47:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51891 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VbMke-0008DH-QD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 23:47:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:35519) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VbMkc-0008D3-IY for 15747@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 23:47:23 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MVG00A00QF9MN00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 15747@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 05:47:15 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MVG00A9GQIRJD40@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 05:47:15 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:79776 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 15747@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 21:52:49 -0400 > > > How do you suppose decimal escapes should be displayed so as to be > > distinguishable from octal escapes? > > I don't think we could do that, indeed. I thought about \d123.