From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16378: bugs #16694/#16378: Patches Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 16:33:39 +0200 Message-ID: <83eh20c2t8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <53174D6A.7010104@binary-island.eu> <5325F7F1.1070209@binary-island.eu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395066851 22715 80.91.229.3 (17 Mar 2014 14:34:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 14:34:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16694@debbugs.gnu.org, 16378@debbugs.gnu.org To: Matthias Dahl Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 17 15:34:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WPYcJ-0005AW-85 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 15:34:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58285 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WPYcI-0003P6-NV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 10:34:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57831) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WPYcB-0003Ov-SS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 10:34:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WPYc7-0000lB-3e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 10:34:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37876) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WPYc7-0000l5-00 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 10:34:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WPYc6-0002GN-6H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 10:34:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 14:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16378 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16378-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16378.13950668198652 (code B ref 16378); Mon, 17 Mar 2014 14:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16378) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Mar 2014 14:33:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39056 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WPYbi-0002FO-Eo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 10:33:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:59229) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WPYbf-0002FA-KZ; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 10:33:36 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N2L00D004A7LS00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 16:33:34 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N2L00D7Q4FXMO00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 16:33:33 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <5325F7F1.1070209@binary-island.eu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:86908 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 20:13:53 +0100 > From: Matthias Dahl > CC: 16378@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , > Eli Zaretskii > > Hello @all. > > It's been almost two weeks since I sent the patches with absolute and > rather discouraging silence in-between. :-) So I quickly wanted to ask > if there is any feedback (whether good or very bad) or something that > needs improving? And if there is a chance of getting those fixes applied > to the tree? Barring any objections, I will commit this in a few days. Thanks.