From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive? Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 21:39:31 +0200 Message-ID: <83egofqz9o.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5505E34C.4000106@dancol.org> <550BD579.9040804@gmx.at> <550C3335.4070405@gmx.at> <83zj77vh87.fsf@gnu.org> <550C7AD1.4080806@gmx.at> <83egojv02r.fsf@gnu.org> <83a8z6vlyn.fsf@gnu.org> <838ueqtnjb.fsf@gnu.org> <834mpetgri.fsf@gnu.org> <83wq29so1g.fsf@gnu.org> <83lhiprktr.fsf@gnu.org> <834mpbspb7.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1427139642 2654 80.91.229.3 (23 Mar 2015 19:40:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 19:40:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, dancol@dancol.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 23 20:40:33 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ya8D6-0006Bw-Af for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 20:40:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57744 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ya8D5-0000vo-QF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 15:40:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59217) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ya8CV-0000Yb-8r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 15:39:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ya8CQ-0003x1-Nh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 15:39:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout28.012.net.il ([80.179.55.184]:55343) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ya8CQ-0003wJ-Fq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 15:39:46 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout28.012.net.il by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NLO00900JN3OB00@mtaout28.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 21:38:21 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NLO007XFJVXFN20@mtaout28.012.net.il>; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 21:38:21 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.184 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:184146 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, dancol@dancol.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 15:28:53 -0400 > > > Otherwise, running the function before redisplay finished its job and > > returned after marking the window up-to-day is bound to catch > > incorrect position of point/cursor sometimes. > > I'm completely lost. What kind of "incorrect position" and what kind of > "catching" are you worried about? "Incorrect position" == position that will never be shown to the user. "Catching" == using an incorrect position for the purposes discussed in this thread.