From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RCS, again: another removed functionality: undo last-checkin Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 09:52:20 +0300 Message-ID: <83eghplja3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87oagx6tzz.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <55FF4026.2050004@yandex.ru> <83si68nu4i.fsf@gnu.org> <87eghsfd3m.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83k2rknr2c.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvwellmg.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <56023A6C.3020302@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1442991156 7537 80.91.229.3 (23 Sep 2015 06:52:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 06:52:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: stephen@xemacs.org, dak@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 23 08:52:26 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zeduk-0001Kf-3j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 08:52:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45769 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zeduj-0003EM-8K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 02:52:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48093) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zeduf-0003DO-Ew for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 02:52:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zedue-0000dc-F1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 02:52:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout24.012.net.il ([80.179.55.180]:56420) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZeduZ-0000b4-N8; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 02:52:15 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout24.012.net.il by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NV400M00AF14X00@mtaout24.012.net.il>; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 09:44:56 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NV400E5HAQW6T70@mtaout24.012.net.il>; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 09:44:56 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <56023A6C.3020302@yandex.ru> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.180 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190269 Archived-At: > Cc: eliz@gnu.org, dak@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 08:36:44 +0300 > > Maybe we should have both "rollback" and "revert" commands. Multiple > backends seem to distinguish them already. That's a possibility, yes. Except that "vc-revert" might not be a good name, because some VCSes (at least svn and bzr) have "revert" commands that do something very different. Or we could conflate both commands into a single vc-rollback, with the second variety triggered by the prefix argument.