From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RCS, again: another removed functionality: undo last-checkin Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:00:33 +0300 Message-ID: <83eghgatxa.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87oagx6tzz.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <55FF4026.2050004@yandex.ru> <83si68nu4i.fsf@gnu.org> <87eghsfd3m.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83k2rknr2c.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvwellmg.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <56023A6C.3020302@yandex.ru> <5602BE3E.1050009@yandex.ru> <5602C4DE.8020105@yandex.ru> <560B4899.2070708@yandex.ru> <83wpv8be0x.fsf@gnu.org> <83mvw4b871.fsf@gnu.org> <560BC90B.1040902@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1443682785 24433 80.91.229.3 (1 Oct 2015 06:59:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 06:59:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: stephen@xemacs.org, dak@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, rms@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 01 08:59:36 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhXq2-0003Wt-9k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 08:59:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39132 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhXq1-0006GY-Ps for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 02:59:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54714) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhHw7-0002ca-KZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 10:00:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhHw3-0005ma-Mr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 10:00:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:59423) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhHvx-0005St-9E; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 10:00:37 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NVH00G00TKMNP00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:00:36 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NVH00GBMTKZHY40@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:00:35 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <560BC90B.1040902@yandex.ru> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190521 Archived-At: > Cc: rms@gnu.org, stephen@xemacs.org, dak@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 14:35:39 +0300 > > On 09/30/2015 11:52 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > You mean, the only problem is give vc-checkin an interactive spec (and > > maybe add an alias vc-commit)? > > And vc-steal-lock, and maybe "unlock"? I can't find the part that > implements the "If every file is locked by you and unchanged, unlock > them" part of the docstring. Maybe we should simply leave the locking VCSes out of this. People who use those back-ends have used vc-next-action for a long time, so I guess they won't really need vc-steal-lock. IOW, let's make vc-checkin interactive so that it assumes the files are not locked by someone else. WDYT?