From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21728: 25.0.50; [patch] mention focus-{in,out}-hook in manual Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 21:57:52 +0300 Message-ID: <83eggouk0f.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87lhawys61.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445453974 24849 80.91.229.3 (21 Oct 2015 18:59:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:59:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21728@debbugs.gnu.org To: Aaron Ecay Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 21 20:59:22 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZoybS-0007wA-7J for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 20:59:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53568 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZoybR-0004G9-Mq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 14:59:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37801) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZoybL-0004Es-S9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 14:59:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZoybG-0002KW-SN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 14:59:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40757) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZoybG-0002KS-Pw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 14:59:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZoybG-0002Td-LO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 14:59:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21728 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 21728-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21728.14454538969444 (code B ref 21728); Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21728) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Oct 2015 18:58:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59695 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZoyaV-0002SG-Mc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 14:58:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout24.012.net.il ([80.179.55.180]:41754) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZoyaB-0002RW-CT for 21728@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 14:58:14 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout24.012.net.il by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NWL00O002Y7U500@mtaout24.012.net.il> for 21728@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 21:51:12 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NWL00MUI31C7X20@mtaout24.012.net.il>; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 21:51:12 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87lhawys61.fsf@gmail.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:107814 Archived-At: > From: Aaron Ecay > Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 19:48:06 +0100 > > The emacs lisp reference doesn’t mention focus-in-hook and its -out- > variant, except in a list of hooks. No, they are also mentioned in the node "Input Focus". And the node "Focus Events", where you suggested the addition, has a cross-reference to "Input Focus", near its beginning. So perhaps what we need is a sentence near that cross-reference that somehow mentions these two hooks, and all the rest is already in place? Would you like to suggest an alternative patch along these lines? Thanks.