From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22107: 25.1; Wrong docstring for this-single-command-keys Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 20:50:29 +0200 Message-ID: <83egeu9lze.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h9jt3o66.fsf@gmail.com> <838u54dgg2.fsf@gnu.org> <83mvtkb882.fsf@gnu.org> <83io47blbq.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449773543 10102 80.91.229.3 (10 Dec 2015 18:52:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 18:52:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22107@debbugs.gnu.org, bruce.connor.am@gmail.com To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 10 19:52:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a76K2-0004Ti-An for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 19:52:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43951 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a76K1-0004x7-NF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:52:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42878) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a76Jy-0004wt-GD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:52:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a76Ju-00057e-Fb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:52:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:56427) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a76Ju-00057Z-CW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:52:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a76Ju-0005hP-7m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:52:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 18:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22107 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22107-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22107.144977349921876 (code B ref 22107); Thu, 10 Dec 2015 18:52:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22107) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2015 18:51:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39454 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a76JW-0005gm-Ss for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:51:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout28.012.net.il ([80.179.55.184]:40439) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a76JV-0005ga-Ot for 22107@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:51:38 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout28.012.net.il by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NZ500A00NQ36H00@mtaout28.012.net.il> for 22107@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 20:49:37 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NZ5002H1OAOPJ80@mtaout28.012.net.il>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 20:49:37 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109846 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com, rgm@gnu.org, 22107@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:37:33 -0500 > > This said, the distinction between "this-single-command-keys" and > "this-command-keys" is something which should disappear, IMNSHO. Are we sure no one out there depends on that? This is a very old feature.