From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Your latest commits on emacs-25
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 22:16:34 +0300
Message-ID: <83ega5bbzh.fsf@gnu.org>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1460834236 25455 80.91.229.3 (16 Apr 2016 19:17:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 19:17:16 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Mark Oteiza <mvoteiza@udel.edu>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 16 21:17:10 2016
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
	by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1arViQ-0006kP-53
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 21:17:10 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60379 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1arViP-0003W8-6e
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 15:17:09 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40755)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1arViC-0003Ts-1X
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 15:16:56 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1arVi8-0000QY-So
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 15:16:55 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:58620)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1arVi8-0000QU-PB; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 15:16:52 -0400
Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3970
	helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128)
	(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1arVi7-0003tc-Ic; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 15:16:52 -0400
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:202994
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/202994>

Mark, I don't understand why these commits: aa0d83a7, 0f332848, and
ac00a92e -- were pushed to emacs-25 and not to master.  The last one
was a very old bug, we've been living with it since 2009.  As for the
other 2, I'm not sure I understand what problem they are solving, let
alone why it was urgent to solve in 25.1.  Can you explain?

Thanks.