From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 ee04aed: Fix handling of buffer relocation in regex.c functions Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 10:37:34 +0200 Message-ID: <83eg2rljxt.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20161023191028.10942.12099@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <20161023191028.C103F220124@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <83mvhu5kn0.fsf@gnu.org> <83funl4v5g.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1478248695 11962 195.159.176.226 (4 Nov 2016 08:38:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 08:38:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 04 09:38:11 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c2a0P-0007kM-9b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2016 09:37:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37091 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c2a0S-00077i-5m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2016 04:37:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55555) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c2Zzw-00077S-2t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2016 04:37:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c2Zzt-0002Xm-0L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2016 04:37:16 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:47142) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c2Zzs-0002XW-TJ; Fri, 04 Nov 2016 04:37:12 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2080 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1c2Zzr-0007HZ-Ng; Fri, 04 Nov 2016 04:37:12 -0400 In-reply-to: <83funl4v5g.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:35:39 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:209146 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:35:39 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > From: Stefan Monnier > > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:18:59 -0400 > > > > > IMO it makes no sense to condition only this on REL_ALLOC, without > > > conditioning all the rest. > > > > I didn't mean to condition only this. Yes, we should condition all code > > that is specific to REL_ALLOC with "#if REL_ALLOC". > > I agree, and will do when the dust settles on this. Done.