From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24635: 24.5; Missing preview of entered unicode codepoints (C-q codepoint SPC) Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 12:10:47 +0200 Message-ID: <83eg1z50pk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <57F770A5.40702@gmx.com> <83vax4ibfd.fsf@gnu.org> <83inrg95gb.fsf@gnu.org> <83eg2493kb.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1480068829 23228 195.159.176.226 (25 Nov 2016 10:13:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 10:13:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 24635-done@debbugs.gnu.org, qqwy@gmx.com To: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 25 11:13:44 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cADVo-0005In-7D for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 11:13:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45030 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cADVr-00031e-R8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 05:13:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41613) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cADUH-0001r1-SV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 05:12:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cADUC-00039y-PQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 05:12:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53921) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cADUC-00038w-M7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 05:12:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cADUA-0000p2-Br for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 05:12:02 -0500 Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 10:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 24635 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Mail-Followup-To: 24635@debbugs.gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, qqwy@gmx.com Original-Received: via spool by 24635-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D24635.14800686883106 (code D ref 24635); Fri, 25 Nov 2016 10:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24635-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2016 10:11:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41083 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cADTY-0000nw-Ue for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 05:11:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50476) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cADTU-0000ng-PZ for 24635-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 05:11:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cADTK-0002c1-Hw for 24635-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 05:11:15 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:59694) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cADT8-0002Qj-63; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 05:10:58 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2226 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cADT7-00052i-DH; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 05:10:57 -0500 In-reply-to: <83eg2493kb.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Mon, 21 Nov 2016 18:54:12 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:126077 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 18:54:12 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: 24635@debbugs.gnu.org, qqwy@gmx.com > > > > Failing that, I'm inclined to go back to using read-event in > > > read-quoted-char. After all, we didn't have any bug reports due to > > > that, and the echo is a valuable feature, IMO. > > > > Indeed, the scenarios where read-key is preferable to read-event in the > > context of read-quoted-char are fairly hypothetical. > > > > So, we should probably revert that for now, but adding a comment about > > why we don't use read-key. > > OK, will do in a couple of days if no one objects. Done on the release branch. > The commit I pointed to made 2 more changes in read-quoted-char, > related to the way unread-command-events is set. I understand that > those two changes also need to be reverted when we go back to using > read-event, right? I reverted those as well.