From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Skipping unexec via a big .elc file Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 13:07:17 +0200 Message-ID: <83eg05c32y.fsf@gnu.org> References: <54AAC13A-CF56-4393-A932-DC6CBBF51259@raeburn.org> <3CC6BB36-1794-4202-8243-132E0345B236@raeburn.org> <52BDCC33-546C-4F47-A230-00EBC813B038@raeburn.org> <15CF14CC-C7DE-44BA-AC7D-F0BF1F160979@raeburn.org> <9463F91F-DB82-48E1-BE01-1E2BC8DA0766@raeburn.org> <831swxzbw8.fsf@gnu.org> <83y3z2wphb.fsf@gnu.org> <83tw9bb42m.fsf@gnu.org> <349ED8B9-C34B-495B-9FB5-E72CE6EFCA38@raeburn.org> <87inpni6xa.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <8360lmesso.fsf@gnu.org> <3B044D64-7C94-42D7-BE1B-7A9CA76C5A67@raeburn.org> <83k29xc49v.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1484392134 26514 195.159.176.226 (14 Jan 2017 11:08:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 11:08:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: raeburn@raeburn.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 14 12:08:45 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cSMCL-0005HI-OF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 12:08:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47388 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSMCO-0005Qr-OZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 06:08:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35954) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSMAw-0004gv-M8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 06:07:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSMAt-00048W-IF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 06:07:10 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:54161) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSMAt-00048S-F6; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 06:07:07 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4834 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cSMAs-0001Vq-LR; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 06:07:07 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Andreas Schwab on Sat, 14 Jan 2017 11:55:42 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:211272 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: Ken Raeburn , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 11:55:42 +0100 > > On Jan 14 2017, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > The line number in the error message is bogus, it points to a require > > line (that's a known issue with byte-compiler error reporting, I > > think). > > It's not bogus, since the error was raised while the byte-compiler > evaluated the form there. It's "bogus" in the sense that it isn't useful for finding the code which triggered the error.