From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28308: Build failure on FreeBSD/aarch64 Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 17:59:17 +0300 Message-ID: <83efrcq7y2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <2e5f41f7-e005-c28f-c04a-79953a804f71@harmless.hu> <8760d17pyj.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <9ae1840f-9056-8771-43fa-b27bbd2b1bd3@harmless.hu> <87k218g33g.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <2fbe77fe-1258-cef2-32e2-f741da514151@harmless.hu> <83y3powdsv.fsf@gnu.org> <87k215lqdf.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <837ex5thtt.fsf@gnu.org> <83tw09s148.fsf@gnu.org> <83bmmhrw84.fsf@gnu.org> <90dd40c6-6837-aac5-fda6-f637bcfcc15b@harmless.hu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1505228444 4215 195.159.176.226 (12 Sep 2017 15:00:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 15:00:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 28308@debbugs.gnu.org, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: Gergely Czuczy Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 12 17:00:29 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1drmfk-0000DJ-IB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 17:00:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36402 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drmfr-0008Mu-Rz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 11:00:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58798) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drmfX-00086F-FV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 11:00:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drmfS-0001hf-RV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 11:00:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55538) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drmfS-0001hX-Nx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 11:00:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1drmfS-0002j0-Ce for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 11:00:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 15:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28308 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 28308-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28308.150522837310410 (code B ref 28308); Tue, 12 Sep 2017 15:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28308) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Sep 2017 14:59:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35986 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1drmez-0002hq-CD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 10:59:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39188) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1drmex-0002he-Pm for 28308@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 10:59:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drmeo-0001Hj-Ng for 28308@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 10:59:26 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:36223) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drmeo-0001Hb-K3; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 10:59:22 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1991 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1drmen-0001Pg-GE; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 10:59:22 -0400 In-reply-to: <90dd40c6-6837-aac5-fda6-f637bcfcc15b@harmless.hu> (message from Gergely Czuczy on Mon, 11 Sep 2017 22:33:45 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:136836 Archived-At: > Cc: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net, 28308@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Gergely Czuczy > Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 22:33:45 +0200 > > It's still in the delete_ttye function, however, 4463 is a call to > delete_terminal, and not to xpalloc. It's interesting why's that frame > #2, because lldb also returns the same as we can see in the source: > (lldb) frame select 3 > frame #3: 0x0000000000168214 > bootstrap-emacs`delete_tty(terminal=0x4f67ed32e8e06446) at term.c:4463 >    4460      before delete_terminal.  */ >    4461   reset_sys_modes (tty); >    4462 > -> 4463   delete_terminal (terminal); >    4464 >    4465   xfree (tty->name); >    4466   xfree (tty->type); > > However, disassembly gave something interesting: > ** 4463   delete_terminal (terminal); >    4464 > >     0x16820c <+224>: bl     0xd40b4 ; coordinates_in_window + 5312 at > window.c:1274 >     0x168210 <+228>: bl     0x22e1f8 ; xpalloc + 16084 at alloc.c:992 > > -> 4465   xfree (tty->name); > > ->  0x168214 <+232>: bl 0x35b294                  ; > text_property_stickiness + 628 at textprop.c:1845 >     0x168218 <+236>: ldurb  w8, [x29, #-0x2c] >     0x16821c <+240>: tbz    w8, #0x0, 0x16823c ; <+272> at term.c > > The pointer is at the xfree call. However, I the disassembly was too > long, I couldn't get anything useful out of it. Can you step through that code, starting at the delete_tty, stepping into the functions, and showing the source lines? I don't see how the code you are showing could possibly be correct. Thanks.