From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: JSON/YAML/TOML/etc. parsing performance
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 20:33:37 +0300
Message-ID: <83efr3j4i6.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87poaqhc63.fsf@lifelogs.com>
	<CAArVCkQTLp=Cmh-FM1R-WK=WYFX_hP=6XiUUinKRT17bciL+CQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAArVCkTj_1P+fTDCzEY5xG8bBB7B6ctNkQCv+bAxt=N_cuD05Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<87efr4jeh3.fsf@udel.edu>
	<CAArVCkSt2QvY8J+xwqWSSuvvaAML+r3g6t-JmTJvFTM5i9f7wg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20170918142818.GA31178@holos.localdomain>
	<CAArVCkTOis-X69FpO1McvMi2o4XLbxEykjng1x7a9PjL18ixnQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<83lglchwxt.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAArVCkSuL_6NFfv3X8jk=xOjBNs-v_y6DfCqZeAGk8C1PCXyCg@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org
X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1505756061 29509 195.159.176.226 (18 Sep 2017 17:34:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 17:34:21 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: mvoteiza@udel.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 18 19:34:14 2017
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
	by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1dtzvv-0007GO-Dq
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 19:34:11 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38017 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1dtzw2-0008EL-FH
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 13:34:18 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44500)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1dtzvw-0008E8-Pj
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 13:34:13 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1dtzvs-0007TK-D8
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 13:34:12 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:47729)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1dtzvs-0007TC-9C; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 13:34:08 -0400
Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4681
	helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1dtzvp-0008Kk-Mr; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 13:34:08 -0400
In-reply-to: <CAArVCkSuL_6NFfv3X8jk=xOjBNs-v_y6DfCqZeAGk8C1PCXyCg@mail.gmail.com>
	(message from Philipp Stephani on Mon, 18 Sep 2017 16:14:32 +0000)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:218477
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/218477>

> From: Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 16:14:32 +0000
> Cc: mvoteiza@udel.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
>  So I must ask you to please revert, and let's wait
>  until the discussion comes to its completion.
> 
> Done; I probably should have waited a few days. 

Thanks.  In a week or so, if no objections or better ideas come up,
please revert the revert.