From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34757: Invalid bytecode from byte compiler Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2019 16:36:04 +0200 Message-ID: <83ef7ha0x7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83k1h9a4ig.fsf@gnu.org> <871s3ho4pi.fsf@web.de> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="137845"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: chuntaro@sakura-games.jp, 34757@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 08 15:37:20 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h2Gcf-000Zh2-En for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 15:37:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44775 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2Gcd-0003Wv-EZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 09:37:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57592) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2GcW-0003VK-Uz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 09:37:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2GcV-0007I4-8M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 09:37:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50664) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2GcV-0007CJ-21 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 09:37:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h2GcQ-000288-2P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 09:37:04 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2019 14:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34757 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34757-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34757.15520557908147 (code B ref 34757); Fri, 08 Mar 2019 14:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34757) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Mar 2019 14:36:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35975 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h2Gbu-00027K-Hd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 09:36:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43042) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h2Gbs-000275-HS for 34757@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 09:36:28 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39827) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2Gbk-0003ls-Vt; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 09:36:21 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1149 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1h2Gbk-0004oC-0L; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 09:36:20 -0500 In-reply-to: <871s3ho4pi.fsf@web.de> (message from Michael Heerdegen on Fri, 08 Mar 2019 14:50:33 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:156148 Archived-At: > From: Michael Heerdegen > Cc: chuntaro , 34757@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2019 14:50:33 +0100 > > Please take a closer look: The Lisp code in the compiled file is > invalid, but the code in the .el isn't. Right, sorry for my confusion.