From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37782: Emacs 27 client adding [I] to the beginning of the buffer Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 16:16:45 +0300 Message-ID: <83eezbbjgi.fsf@gnu.org> References: <831rvbdcjq.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="181278"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 37782@debbugs.gnu.org To: Carlos Pita Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 17 15:37:39 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iL5yE-000l0M-HM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 15:37:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48066 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iL5yC-00088G-U3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 09:37:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34299) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iL5fJ-0001EK-RH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 09:18:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iL5fI-00078x-0d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 09:18:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38572) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iL5fG-00073T-3R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 09:18:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iL5fF-0004Kk-Ri for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 09:18:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 13:18:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37782 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 37782-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37782.157131822916576 (code B ref 37782); Thu, 17 Oct 2019 13:18:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37782) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Oct 2019 13:17:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47393 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iL5eP-0004JI-7V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 09:17:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53312) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iL5eM-0004Ij-SS for 37782@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 09:17:07 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37081) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iL5eH-0005vb-Hd; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 09:17:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4223 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iL5eG-0007Pr-W0; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 09:17:01 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Carlos Pita on Thu, 17 Oct 2019 09:26:26 -0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:169574 Archived-At: > From: Carlos Pita > Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 09:26:26 -0300 > Cc: 37782@debbugs.gnu.org > > Moreover, in emacs 26 those two focus-in/out sequences are not defined at all. Which probably explains why you didn't see the problem in Emacs 26, right?