From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39115: 26.3; eww consecutive links look like one link with mouse-over Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 16:39:46 +0200 Message-ID: <83eevqtex9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86imlfxu7t.fsf@gmail.com> <87sgk7ttca.fsf@gnus.org> <837e1jv4fa.fsf@gnu.org> <8736c7qp4x.fsf@gmx.net> <83r1zrthvn.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2tzp6g4.fsf@gmx.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="81388"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 39115@debbugs.gnu.org, ynyaaa@gmail.com To: Stephen Berman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 23 18:13:04 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iug2R-000L8Z-OF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 18:13:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33136 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iug2Q-0000FV-73 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 12:13:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35833) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iudeN-0004mU-UY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 09:40:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iudeM-0005Rz-Kh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 09:40:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46066) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iudeM-0005Rc-HI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 09:40:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iudeM-0008LJ-EK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 09:40:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 14:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39115 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 39115-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39115.157979038032015 (code B ref 39115); Thu, 23 Jan 2020 14:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39115) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jan 2020 14:39:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52035 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iude0-0008KJ-IN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 09:39:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54861) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iuddy-0008K6-Li for 39115@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 09:39:38 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59120) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iuddr-0004Dv-Lz; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 09:39:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2485 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iuddq-0002ND-T4; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 09:39:31 -0500 In-reply-to: <87y2tzp6g4.fsf@gmx.net> (message from Stephen Berman on Wed, 22 Jan 2020 21:44:11 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:175163 Archived-At: > From: Stephen Berman > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, ynyaaa@gmail.com, 39115@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 21:44:11 +0100 > > Why do overlays and text properties differ on this? That's a side effect of different implementations. Text properties are kept as intervals, and so two adjacent intervals with the same value of the property are indistinguishable from a single interval covering both stretches of text (and AFAIR we actually convert them into a single interval when we see fit). By contrast, overlays are kept in a list, and you can have any number of them at the same position with the same property (which is why you can have, e.g., two or more after-strings at EOB, and they will both be displayed).