all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: dancol@dancol.org, pipcet@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Failing to GC killed buffers considered harmful
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 21:51:48 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83eet93ccb.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwvftdpog14.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 30 Mar 2020 14:32:30 -0400)

> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,  Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol.org>,
>   emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 14:32:30 -0400
> 
> > FWIW, maybe we should get rid of all_buffers.
> > AFAICT the only reason we need it is to unmark the buffers during the
> > sweep phase, and we could allocate buffers like any other
> > pseudovector instead.
> 
> The patch below seems to work.
> 
> The only worrisome part I think is that `live_buffer_holding` allowed
> pointers into buffer objects, whereas `live_vector_p` only treats
> pointers to the beginning of the object as a valid reference.
> 
> Not sure why buffers would be more likely to have valid pointers into
> them (and can't remember discussions about that either), so I assume the
> difference was not important (it just happened to be easier to support
> that for buffers).
> 
> Any objection?

What are the advantages?  The original problem is solved, and
everybody agreed that having a dead buffer in the pdumped area is
nothing we should bother about.



  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-30 18:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-29 14:23 Failing to GC killed buffers considered harmful Eli Zaretskii
2020-03-29 16:45 ` Stefan Monnier
2020-03-29 18:54   ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-03-29 19:06     ` Daniel Colascione
2020-03-29 19:24       ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-03-29 16:46 ` Pip Cet
2020-03-29 18:48   ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-03-29 19:07     ` Pip Cet
2020-03-29 19:12       ` Daniel Colascione
2020-03-29 19:25         ` Pip Cet
2020-03-29 19:28           ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-03-30 15:36             ` Pip Cet
2020-03-30 15:53               ` dancol
2020-03-30 17:07             ` Stefan Monnier
2020-03-30 17:02   ` Stefan Monnier
2020-03-30 18:32     ` Stefan Monnier
2020-03-30 18:51       ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2020-03-30 19:14         ` Daniel Colascione
2020-03-30 19:40         ` Stefan Monnier
2020-03-31 14:07           ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-03-31 14:09       ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-03-31 21:57         ` Stefan Monnier
2020-03-31 14:58       ` Pip Cet
2020-03-31 16:52         ` Stefan Monnier
2020-03-31 18:23           ` Pip Cet
2020-03-31 19:20             ` Stefan Monnier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83eet93ccb.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=dancol@dancol.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
    --cc=pipcet@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.