From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39517: [PATCH] Add new option 'word-wrap-boundary' Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2020 17:11:29 +0300 Message-ID: <83eeof6h9q.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20200209074334.16270-1-tomtomjhj@gmail.com> <83lfpbdbbq.fsf@gnu.org> <83tv3ybeyf.fsf@gnu.org> <87zh74t64l.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34697"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 39517@debbugs.gnu.org, tomtomjhj@gmail.com To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 09 16:12:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k4m3W-0008vW-K2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2020 16:12:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39694 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k4m3V-000481-6Z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2020 10:12:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44900) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k4m3O-00047e-S9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2020 10:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49924) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k4m3O-0002P0-JS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2020 10:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k4m3O-0003r4-Ft for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2020 10:12:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2020 14:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39517 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 39517-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39517.159698231414803 (code B ref 39517); Sun, 09 Aug 2020 14:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39517) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2020 14:11:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33236 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k4m3G-0003qh-32 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2020 10:11:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34770) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k4m3D-0003qS-3v for 39517@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2020 10:11:52 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60340) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k4m37-0002Op-Ta; Sun, 09 Aug 2020 10:11:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1822 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1k4m37-0000l2-Ca; Sun, 09 Aug 2020 10:11:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87zh74t64l.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sun, 09 Aug 2020 13:23:38 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:184425 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 39517@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2020 13:23:38 +0200 > > Copyright assignment papers are on file now, I see. And I think the > feature makes sense -- wrapping on "/" characters, for instance, is > something I think buffers for editing HTML (and the like) would benefit > from. > > Eli had some comments about the implementation, though. Could you spin > a new version of the patch that takes those comments into consideration? Isn't this feature superseded by the more general one submitted in the discussion on emacs-devel Re: Line wrap reconsidered? There, I'm waiting for the final submission after the last review, and will probably install after that. If the changes there don't do everything this proposal does, I suggest to modify this proposal to be compatible with that one. Thanks.