From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#42904: [PATCH] Non-Unicode frame title crashes Emacs on macOS Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 15:24:03 +0300 Message-ID: <83eeo4f8gs.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83lfidgtc7.fsf@gnu.org> <838sedgq2x.fsf@gnu.org> <02F52D43-7EAB-4E61-A567-E8CCD11D856B@acm.org> <20200817195610.GA70682@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <3F71EF82-A143-4E3A-AEF3-8A236091891D@acm.org> <20200818084306.GA89999@breton.holly.idiocy.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29452"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 42904@debbugs.gnu.org, mattiase@acm.org To: Alan Third Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 18 14:26:15 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k80gx-0007WL-7I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 14:26:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46632 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k80gw-0002cu-9H for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:26:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60772) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k80fm-0001TC-VD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:25:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51145) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k80fm-0002Fc-Kp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:25:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k80fm-0006tv-Ge for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:25:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 12:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42904 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 42904-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42904.159775346426477 (code B ref 42904); Tue, 18 Aug 2020 12:25:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 42904) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Aug 2020 12:24:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34458 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k80fA-0006sy-Ha for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:24:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50448) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k80f9-0006sn-Hn for 42904@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:24:23 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51111) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k80f4-00026S-A5; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:24:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3708 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1k80f3-0005xq-Li; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:24:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20200818084306.GA89999@breton.holly.idiocy.org> (message from Alan Third on Tue, 18 Aug 2020 10:43:10 +0200 (CEST)) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:185469 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 10:43:10 +0200 (CEST) > From: Alan Third > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 42904@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Is SDATA guaranteed to be 16-bit aligned? Doesn't matter on x86 or > > PowerPC, but strictly speaking... > > I've no idea, I adapted the code from make_multibyte_string in > alloc.c, and one of it's callers (although I can't remember which > right now). I'm expecting Eli to appear and tell me this is the > entirely wrong way of doing this. ;) It isn't wrong (and there's no need to worry about alignment in this case, AFAIK). Thanks.