From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44517: 28.0.50; Can't unselect minibuffer window Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2020 19:54:07 +0200 Message-ID: <83eel368g0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k0uwjamq.fsf@web.de> <20201108140214.GB18190@ACM> <877dqvby3y.fsf@web.de> <83lffb6aof.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2jbahhk.fsf@web.de> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32548"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: acm@muc.de, 44517@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 08 18:55:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kbouD-0008Ln-R5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2020 18:55:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56574 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kbouC-00030n-So for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2020 12:55:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58674) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kbou6-00030g-CG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2020 12:55:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49690) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kbou6-0007C6-2J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2020 12:55:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kbou6-0003OI-0e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2020 12:55:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2020 17:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44517 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 44517-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44517.160485806312985 (code B ref 44517); Sun, 08 Nov 2020 17:55:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44517) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Nov 2020 17:54:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33003 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kbotT-0003NN-KV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2020 12:54:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58452) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kbotS-0003NA-1P for 44517@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2020 12:54:22 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54127) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kbotM-00079V-0l; Sun, 08 Nov 2020 12:54:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2807 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kbot8-0003U9-HL; Sun, 08 Nov 2020 12:54:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87y2jbahhk.fsf@web.de> (message from Michael Heerdegen on Sun, 08 Nov 2020 18:25:11 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:192895 Archived-At: > From: Michael Heerdegen > Cc: acm@muc.de, 44517@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2020 18:25:11 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > This probably means that the delay is not due to a timer, but to a > > call to sit-for or somesuch. For example, if you type C-x, the echo > > appears after a delay that doesn't have to do anything with timers. > > Sounds reasonable, yes. > > I didn't find out anything on the Lisp level. `post-command-hook' > doesn't seem to be involved. I traced some potentially related > functions, like `sit-for' and `select-window' but they were not called > when the issue happened. There's sit_for in dispnew.c.