From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding. Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 20:14:34 +0200 Message-ID: <83eehx3to5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo.ref@Ergus> <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo@Ergus> <87zh0mmr54.fsf@gmail.com> <87y2g5smya.fsf@gmail.com> <4FF55FBF-573D-4A70-B3FC-682CA25B7ECB@gnu.org> <83lfc53whk.fsf@gnu.org> <20210203180142.seu6o3i6u7jhkyrh@Ergus> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40236"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: kevin.legouguec@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ergus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 03 19:16:25 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7MhU-000AK6-CW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 19:16:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54346 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7MhT-0005pn-83 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 13:16:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53646) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7Mfs-0004EQ-7T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 13:14:45 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48864) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7Mfr-0005t2-6N; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 13:14:43 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1653 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l7Mfj-0007EK-QM; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 13:14:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20210203180142.seu6o3i6u7jhkyrh@Ergus> (message from Ergus on Wed, 3 Feb 2021 19:01:42 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263819 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 19:01:42 +0100 > From: Ergus > Cc: Drew Adams , emacs-devel@gnu.org, > kevin.legouguec@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org > > > > >> IMO, the binding should be removed until/unless > >> the discussion here leads to a decision to add > >> it back again. > > > >Please wait till the discussion comes to its conclusion. > > In my short experience here; when discussions start like this; then > there is never a conclusion. They just slowly stop and no change is made > at the end. I someone insists after some time, the again the same... > > In 3 years I have more than 30 examples... I don't think I understand what you are saying. You started this discussion. If you don't like how discussions happen here, why did you start it?