From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#56459: 29.0.50; Edebug disables Eldoc Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 15:04:38 +0200 Message-ID: <83edqagcux.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zghieol4.fsf@gmail.com> <871qurzzyv.fsf@gnus.org> <83pmibzx0k.fsf@gnu.org> <20220731195223.90596.FMU217810@trabanten-schwein.prv.splode.com> <87sfmg1bpf.fsf@gnus.org> <5dd202b1-3dfb-022a-d458-c0a13c1a2d59@yandex.ru> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32627"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: max.brieiev@gmail.com, larsi@gnus.org, 56459@debbugs.gnu.org, friedman@splode.com To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 28 14:05:14 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pWzfO-0008NM-6H for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 14:05:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pWzfD-0002Pk-VV; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 08:05:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pWzfC-0002PO-SL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 08:05:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pWzfC-00082B-E8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 08:05:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pWzfC-0007Iw-1Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 08:05:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 13:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56459 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 56459-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56459.167758947728032 (code B ref 56459); Tue, 28 Feb 2023 13:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 56459) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2023 13:04:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49912 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pWzem-0007I4-Ug for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 08:04:37 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43702) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pWzek-0007Hr-PI for 56459@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 08:04:35 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pWzee-0007sd-QB; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 08:04:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=Fv8/5U36rCmADvq1MmZwoevhB1DiX+ON4jztlUegq1g=; b=NNB8RjZ1weP7 QxU1f0XwMTb8xqMNd3aizRwgEXQrnUIHMRZifVJ5elKBxT3mcPNpU2Szwj8nkH16ddqhjz3kzdoQ9 dLUoDwjbShC8o9jJzmB0N8uj3X5BXfEF1OFnELS4B4Ng8x8erVbXxWYBGgm0CaN+Kmx+q4faok2Oz teK6lWPTZVB55FBXps+f97rrT2Qs9+6swywruB18lABBkMNe2dVKJwFXIUL4fr9z6qUciQBpJGnjS pia+YE3zxaJA/kiJBoECCMHZZ+gWduDRLO8WJTijRLzAnFYpNyJHqrsLByHXkyOIbZx6fQWW2SsuO x+HdyiM8A0b9wbwvofSd4w==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pWzee-0001X2-90; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 08:04:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5dd202b1-3dfb-022a-d458-c0a13c1a2d59@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Tue, 28 Feb 2023 04:15:41 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:256957 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 04:15:41 +0200 > Cc: max.brieiev@gmail.com, eliz@gnu.org, 56459@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > > Hi Lars and others, > > On 01/08/2022 13:48, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > >> and the behavior is still that only the edebug results are visible; > >> that is, eldoc's messages aren't covering up the edebug messages, but > >> they aren't showing up below them either and they're not even showing > >> up in any mode line. > >> > >> So the practical upshot is, I see no change in behavior; whatever > >> motivated that change seems to be a non-issue now. > > If I remove that check, I don't see any problems -- stepping through the > > code doesn't trigger eldoc, so there's no covering up of messages. (But > > moving the cursor after stepping triggers eldoc, but that seems fine.) > > What I'm seeing now, is stepping through Edebug often does invoke Eldoc, > which triggers messages which do override edebug evaluations. > > Which seems like a problem previously solved by that check. Maybe. I also sometimes see this, but just now trying Edebug on a random function doesn't reproduce this. Can you reproduce at will? if so, can you show a recipe?