From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5235: 23.1; Unibyte keyboard input problem Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 22:42:14 +0200 Message-ID: <83d4226b15.fsf@gnu.org> References: <200912162217.14991.scianagoryczy@wp.pl> <4B338705.5090508@gnu.org> <200912251203.29628.scianagoryczy@wp.pl> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii , 5235@debbugs.gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1261775268 19249 80.91.229.12 (25 Dec 2009 21:07:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 21:07:48 +0000 (UTC) To: Tomasz =?UTF-8?Q?Zbro=C5=BCek?= , 5235@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 25 22:07:41 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NOHNr-0003rY-I0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2009 22:07:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53038 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NOHNj-0001d9-Dy for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2009 16:07:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NOHNe-0001cx-B2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2009 16:07:26 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NOHNX-0001cL-S6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2009 16:07:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47516 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NOHNX-0001cI-Oc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2009 16:07:19 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60817) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NOHNW-0002av-OB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2009 16:07:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NOGy6-0001UM-Dj; Fri, 25 Dec 2009 15:41:02 -0500 X-Loop: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , 5235@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 20:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 5235 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 5235-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B5235.12617736165711 (code B ref 5235); Fri, 25 Dec 2009 20:41:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5235) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Dec 2009 20:40:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NOGxM-0001U4-9n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2009 15:40:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NOGxK-0001Tz-Nq for 5235@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2009 15:40:15 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KV800A006ODWP00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 5235@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2009 22:39:56 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.236.58]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KV80053A6QJ3LU0@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Fri, 25 Dec 2009 22:39:56 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <200912251203.29628.scianagoryczy@wp.pl> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 15:41:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:33770 Archived-At: > From: Tomasz Zbro=C5=BCek > Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 12:03:29 +0100 > Cc: 5235@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org >=20 > The multibyte mode and its prompts for correct codepage is not prob= lem. I=20 > think it's definitelty CORRECT behaviour and it's not the case I wa= nted to=20 > submit to you. =20 > I think that solution for the problem with two code pages in one fi= le is=20 > unibyte mode. I think Emacs developers are much more motivated to improve the multibyte mode than to fix the unibyte mode. I cannot speak for the head maintainers, but that is certainly my opinion: the unibyte mode should simply die, as a mode for interactive editing. You received several suggestions for trying things in multibyte mode. Perhaps you could try them and see if they allow you to edit your programs without screwing up the cp852 characters. If something is still wrong, please describe the problems here: we are much more likely to find a solution for multibyte mode editing than for unibyte= .