From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5833: 23.1.94; Opening files on network shares on w32 is slow Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 21:16:42 +0300 Message-ID: <83d3ycxx85.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8339zb21w3.fsf@gnu.org> <838w92yt7f.fsf@gnu.org> <83mxxhy31s.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1270578484 9030 80.91.229.12 (6 Apr 2010 18:28:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 18:28:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 5833@debbugs.gnu.org To: Mathias Dahl Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 06 20:28:03 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzDVI-0008TG-PX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 20:28:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55976 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NzDVI-0002Rx-85 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:28:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NzDTW-0001pn-8f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:26:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45688 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NzDTR-0001mC-1W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:26:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzDTP-0001DC-Fe for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:26:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38131) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzDTP-0001D4-DW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:26:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzDLe-00049V-CD; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:18:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 5833 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 5833-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B5833.127057784215952 (code B ref 5833); Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:18:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5833) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Apr 2010 18:17:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzDL0-00049E-87 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:17:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzDKx-000497-S4 for 5833@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:17:21 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L0G00800UL9IS00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 5833@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 21:16:36 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.92.42]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L0G00729W3MB3A0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 21:16:35 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:18:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:36003 Archived-At: > From: Mathias Dahl > Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 09:12:40 +0200 > Cc: 5833@debbugs.gnu.org > > The results are very interesting: If by ``interesting'' you mean the few large readings after the initial one, I'd suspect some heavy network traffic at that moment that slows down file access. Do you have any other explanations? > Suddenly we get relatively good results. It means most of the time is not spent in actually reading the file, but in something else. > find-file-noselect 30 119.71899999 3.9906333333 > find-file-noselect-1 30 84.484000000 2.8161333333 > insert-file-contents 30 42.253 1.4084333333 > after-find-file 30 42.230999999 1.4076999999 > file-exists-p 780 34.638999999 0.0444089743 > file-truename 60 29.048999999 0.4841499999 Perhaps look at why we spend about 1 sec (3.99 - 2.81) inside find-file-noselect, and also why are we calling file-exists-p so many times.