From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: grep breakage Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 22:54:03 +0200 Message-ID: <83d3n1rkt0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sjvx8a8s.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83ei7hroxu.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1297357130 29558 80.91.229.12 (10 Feb 2011 16:58:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:58:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: sds@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 10 17:58:46 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PnZqv-0005GK-Fb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 17:58:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42008 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PnZqu-0005AF-Dx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 11:58:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40576 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PnH2x-0004Yv-9h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 15:53:56 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PnH2v-00061o-89 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 15:53:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:52802) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PnH2v-00061N-1f; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 15:53:53 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LGD00500B27OO00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 22:53:51 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.171.5]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LGD005YYBDMMR30@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 22:53:49 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:135844 Archived-At: > From: Sam Steingold > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 14:31:40 -0500 > > > * Eli Zaretskii [2011-02-09 21:24:45 +0200]: > >> > >> > * Chong Yidong [2011-02-09 11:04:51 -0500]: > >> > > >> >> I thought that the bug tracker was for the released versions. > >> > > >> > Nope, the same rationale applies to using the bug tracker for the > >> > development and released versions. > >> > >> should I report the global.h windows issue of this morning to the bug > >> tracker? > > > > No, it doesn't make sense to use the bug tracker for such transient > > problems. > > Now I am _eminently_ confused. > :-( How can I help you with that confusion? We simply don't use to report build breakages to the bug tracker. All the other bugs should be reported there.