From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: md5 broken? Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 19:55:07 +0300 Message-ID: <83d3j2bw9g.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ipsv188f.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkm7t3n4.fsf@rho.meyering.net> <83hb8fasyb.fsf@gnu.org> <87lixrt0fx.fsf@rho.meyering.net> <83fwnyc3v1.fsf@gnu.org> <4DE11E56.9040506@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1306601732 28629 80.91.229.12 (28 May 2011 16:55:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 16:55:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, jim@meyering.net, antoine.levitt@gmail.com To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 28 18:55:27 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QQMnN-0002QS-Sk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 May 2011 18:55:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41719 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QQMnN-0007qC-AL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 May 2011 12:55:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46083) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QQMnL-0007q6-4q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 May 2011 12:55:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QQMnK-0006mZ-4g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 May 2011 12:55:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:65023) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QQMnJ-0006mU-Ub for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 May 2011 12:55:22 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LLX0070007SA900@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 May 2011 19:55:03 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.221.158]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LLX007PY0BP9910@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 28 May 2011 19:55:03 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <4DE11E56.9040506@cs.ucla.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:139840 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 09:09:58 -0700 > From: Paul Eggert > CC: Jim Meyering , antoine.levitt@gmail.com, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > > On 05/28/11 07:10, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > if it is decided to switch to "inline" everywhere, we > > should make sure it works with all the supported builds, not only with > > those that run `configure'. > > Plain 'inline' has been in use for over a month, > and it builds on MS-DOS (according to the log for > bzr 104154) "Builds" is not enough. We also want to assure that every compiler that supports inline functions really sees the inline keyword there. > so it does appear that it works with all supported builds. There's also the Windows build, which still supports non-GCC compilers. > The "extern inline" issue is that C99 has a different > semantics for "extern inline" than GCC traditionally did. > As long as we stay away from "extern inline" we shouldn't > have to worry about that porting problem. (This issue > applies equally to 'inline' and to 'INLINE'.) I don't mind using either one, but I think we only need to use one, not both. Using both is a maintenance headache. That's all I'm saying.