From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Your changes in revision 106240
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 22:54:10 +0200
Message-ID: <83d3df8qod.fsf@gnu.org>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1319921661 27872 80.91.229.12 (29 Oct 2011 20:54:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 20:54:21 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 29 22:54:17 2011
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1RKFuy-0002Ut-Sl
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 22:54:17 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42346 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1RKFuy-0006p1-Cj
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 16:54:16 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47209)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1RKFuv-0006ow-W7
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 16:54:14 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1RKFuu-0007MG-Q8
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 16:54:13 -0400
Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:56016)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1RKFuu-0007M8-Jc
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 16:54:12 -0400
Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by
	a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id
	<0LTU00D00I0EZ400@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for
	emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 22:54:11 +0200 (IST)
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.128.216]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il
	(HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id
	<0LTU00DFLI29IN80@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>;
	Sat, 29 Oct 2011 22:54:11 +0200 (IST)
X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta)
X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:145782
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/145782>

  -which_symbols (Lisp_Object obj, int find_max)
  +which_symbols (Lisp_Object obj, EMACS_INT find_max)

Why? what possible harm can be done by using an int here?  And what
does EMACS_INT have to do with the maximum number of symbols that the
caller wants to see?