From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC (was: lexical-binding questions) Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 11:16:16 +0300 Message-ID: <83d36j59gv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <871umzrvfw.fsf@gmail.com> <87wr4rqg6g.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1336205905 14793 80.91.229.3 (5 May 2012 08:18:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 08:18:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Thierry Volpiatto Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 05 10:18:25 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SQaC8-0007AE-Ry for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 10:18:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36927 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQaC8-0000Je-6P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 04:18:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52167) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQaC5-0000JZ-ON for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 04:18:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQaC4-0002XX-4F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 04:18:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:63150) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQaC3-0002XT-St for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 04:18:20 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M3J00B00IXX6V00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 11:18:17 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.210.75]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M3J00AMIJ2HTV90@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 05 May 2012 11:18:17 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87wr4rqg6g.fsf@gmail.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:150273 Archived-At: > From: Thierry Volpiatto > Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 08:45:43 +0200 > > #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp > ;; -*- lexical-binding: t -*- > > (defun foo () > (declare (special bar)) > (let ((bar 2) > (baz 3)) > #'(lambda () (+ bar baz)))) > > ;; I expect this: > > ;; (funcall (foo)) > ;;=>Symbol's value as variable is void: bar > > #+END_SRC Do these BEGIN_SRC and END_SRC marks serve some useful purpose in mail messages?